Follow Us

facebook_logo Twitter_promo



To really save your skin this summer, use less toxic sunscreens

The Environmental Working Group helps sort out which sunscreens are safest.

By Barbara Kessler
Green Right Now

If you want to save your skin from sun damage, you’ll have to do more than just slap on the sunscreen with the highest UVA/UVB number.

In fact, there’s a wealth to learn about on the fine print of your prospective skin cancer protectant, but unless you’ve got a master’s in bio-chemistry, you’ll need a little help. That’s where the Environmental Working Group can help.

Badger Sunscreen, protects without adding toxic chemicals

According to the EWG, the old method of just looking for the brand that promised the highest protection via the AVA/AVB number listed on its label is simply not good enough. There’s a better way to sort out the most effective and safest sunscreens — by looking for products that use zinc or titanium minerals to block out the sun’s harmful rays, but stay away from a lot of toxic additives.

Those minerals work to keep the sun’s harmful rays from damaging your precious epidermis, and while they’re still the lesser of two evils (sun damage with its risk of skin cancer being the true enemy) they’re safer for your skin than many other things that find their way into your sunscreen products.

To make this whole process easier on the eyes (those label ingredients are tiny!) and skin, the EWG has put out a list of safer, least or non-toxic, sunscreens that you can shop by. None of its non-toxic “winners” contain harmful ingredients such as oxybenzone or vitamin A (which can increase sun sensitivity) or any other ingredient that’s been found to be a hormone disruptor. (When it comes to protection, kids and teens especially should really avoid these hormone-affecting ingredients.)

Some of the brands that made the EWG recommended list (click to see the EWG assessment for each one) include:

Most of the sunscreens sold under these labels rate a low 1 or 2 on the toxicity scale developed by the EWG; a few variants might have a higher rating (meaning they contain one or more ingredients of moderate concern). But none rank in the red-alert zone.

These brands are commonly available at natural food markets and online.

Unfortunately, some of the most popular brands on the market today, sold at big retail outlets, receive some of the worst marks from EWG.

Soleo Organic's 30+ can be safer than toxic competitor's with 100 UVA/UBA ratings

Soleo Organic's 30+ sunscreen can be better for you than some sunscreens with a 100 UVA/UBA rating

Some of the big brands offer options, however, that fall into the “moderate” concern rankings. Coppertone, for instance, offers several variations for kids that rank a 3 on the 10-point scale (with products ranking 7-10 listed as “to avoid”). Coppertone Kids Pure and Simple ranks a 3 overall. It does contain some ingredients of concern, such as diazolidinyl urea or formaldehyde and methyl paraben. But on balance, it’s not as  problematic as other sunscreens that contain many additives of concern, including synthetic fragrances.

Many popular sunscreens rated in the “to avoid” range because of dangerous additives like oxybenzone, which has been linked to reproductive health problems and is considered to be an endocrine disruptor.

Banana Boat’s Kids Max Protect and Play Broad Spectrum Sunscreen, SPF 100, is one example of how a product that looks protective can be less effective and even contain harmful ingredients, according to the EWG rating system.

Kids Max Protect rates a 7 on the scale because it contains several dubious ingredients, along with oxybenzone, one of the most harmful ingredients found in sunscreens.

The EWG is a non-profit dedicated to helping consumers avoid exposure to dangerous chemicals in food, cosmetics and other household products.

Copyright © 2010 Green Right Now | Distributed by GRN NetworkI

How to make your summer party green

By Harriet Blake and Barbara Kessler
Green Right Now

Climate and the daily weather forecast will dictate if you entertain al fresco or indoors this summer. Either way, warm weather gatherings lend themselves to being green.

To keep the garden party eco-friendly, and still eco-nomical, think about using durable, reusable goods made from low-impact or re-purposed materials, or if the occasion calls for disposables, make them bioplastic. You don’t have to forfeit the magic, see the twinkly solar lights we found!

So…before you stock up on plastic plates or throwaway table clothes, let’s take a look at what’s available in the greener patio party department. You might be pleasantly surprised that these finds will keep you outfitted for fetes from Memorial Day through Labor Day, and beyond. Get ready with those summer invitations!

Pier 1's selection of recycled glassware is doubly green

Pier 1's selection of recycled glassware is doubly green

We started our hunt looking for tableware, and found this affordable, recycled glass collection at  Pier 1.  The collection includes goblets ($9), margarita glasses ($8), tumblers ($5) and pitchers ($9).

Spokeswoman Jennifer L. Engstrand says the Fort Worth-based store has made eco-friendly products a part of the mix for a long time. In addition to the recycled glassware, their offerings include recycled newspaper baskets, reusable bags, bio-degradable jute rugs and several rugs and accessories made of “rapidly renewable materials” such as rattan, seagrass and bamboo, she said.

Your perfumes’ secret ingredients may harm your health

Secret and harmful ingredients in fragrances are not so sexy, according to a consumer study

Secret and harmful ingredients in fragrances are not so sexy, according to a consumer study

By Melissa Segrest
Green Right Now

What is that lovely fragrance you’re wearing?

Shhh, it’s a secret.

Why? Because the multi-billion dollar perfume industry won’t tell you. Thanks to lax regulatory oversight and the scent industry’s ability to keep their formulas “secret,” the ingredients lurking beneath the word “fragrance” on the label likely contain unhealthy chemicals and additives.

Fragrance, it seems, isn’t just a delicate floral note or a deep exotic spice.  A new report analyzing 17 popular name-brand scents says that among the hidden ingredients are synthetic chemicals that have been linked to hormone disruption (particularly reproductive hormones), sperm damage in men, thyroid effects, endocrine problems, allergic reactions of all kinds and more.

Lab tests commissioned by the study’s authors found 38 “secret” (not on the label) chemicals in 17 scents, including Hannah Montana Secret Celebrity, Britney Spears Curious, Calvin Klein Eternity for Men, Halle by Halle Berry, Quicksilver, AXE Body Spray For Men /Shock and Jennifer Lopez J. Lo Glow.

Counting both labeled and unlabeled ingredients, the study identified 91 different chemicals in the 17 products.

The organizations that authored the study, Campaign for Safe Cosmetics and the Environmental Working Group, said that, on average, the products had 14 hidden chemicals. If that wasn’t enough, even ingredients that are on the labels may be health threats.

The report, Not So Sexy: The Health Risks of Secret Chemicals in Fragrance, found the largest hidden chemical mix in American Eagle Seventy Seven, which had 24 unseen ingredients. Just behind that was Chanel Coco at 18.

The fewest secret chemicals in the mix was Dolce & Gabbana’s Light Blue.

The scent with the most chemicals overall was Giorgio Armani Acqua Di Gio with 40.

All 17 of the tested products had chemicals linked to allergies or asthma– an average of 10 chemicals per product.

Among the worrisome elements in the selected scents:

  • Two synthetic musks — Galaxolide and Tonalide – which have been linked with damage to the endocrine system, appeared in almost all 17 products.
  • Diethyl phthalate, or DEP, is a common solvent in perfume. Studies have found that DEP could lead to abnormal development of baby boys’ reproductive organs and sperm damage in men, the report said, citing a 2009 study. Now, pregnant women who are exposed to DEP have shown a potential link between the chemical and attention deficit disorder in children. (In the study, Calvin Klein Eternity for Woman had the highest level  – 32,000 parts per million — of DEP.)
  • Chemicals known to cause allergic reactions, and others considered potential allergens among the 17 products tested included limonene (also used as a solvent in cleaning products), linalol acetate, geraniol, benzyl alcohol, citronellol and lilial. Even though some of these chemicals are derived from natural sources, they are still on the list of things that can cause irritation, eczema, asthma or illness in infants.
  • Some hormone disrupters, the study said, can interfere with the endocrine system, and others may stimulate hormones such as estrogen. A higher risk for breast and prostate cancer, and even birth defects and infertility, have been cited in other studies. In the fragrance study, 12 of those ingredients were detected. Three products that each had seven of these potential hormone-disrupting ingredients: Halle by Halle Berry, Quicksilver and Jennifer Lopez J. Lo Glow. Among the chemicals: galaxolide, DEP, BHT and benzyl salicylate.
  • Sunscreen and UV-absorbing chemicals, the report said, are typically disclosed on labels, but they too have been connected in studies to disruption of the endocrine system. You may also find these ingredients – octinoxate, oxybenzone or butylated hydroxytoluene – in common sunscreen products.

Why doesn’t the Food and Drug Administration step in to scrutinize these chemical ingredients in all perfumes, as well as lotions, cosmetics, deodorants, sprays, shaving creams and many more? Because – with a few minor exceptions – scented and all other cosmetics do not require FDA approval to reach store shelves.

Amazingly, the law that started this lack of federal oversight was enacted 82 years ago, the study said, and has hardly been touched since.

The rules that govern what ingredients must appear on cosmetic and fragrance labels were issued in 1973, and they cite “trade secret ingredients” as the reason the industry can continue to hide their fragrance ingredients.

“Something doesn’t smell right—clearly the system is broken,” said Lisa Archer, national coordinator of the Campaign for Safe Cosmetics at the Breast Cancer Fund, in a statement. “We urgently need updated laws that require full disclosure of cosmetic ingredients so consumers can make informed choices about what they are being exposed to.”

The perfume and cosmetic groups are quick to defend themselves. They assert that the study is not legitimate because it is self-published (as opposed to having been peer-reviewed in a substantive science journal). They point to what they consider innuendo and unsupported claims.

“There is nothing ‘secret’ about the ingredients being used in fragrances,” a statement issued Wednesday by the Fragrance Material Association of the United States said. The association directs consumers to their list of 3,163 ingredients used in fragrances. The list, however, provides the chemical names (in alphabetical order) of all substances used in fragrances. It is not broken down by product, or product category.

Two-thirds of the undisclosed ingredients in the tested fragrances have not been safety tested, nor has a significant portion of disclosed ingredients

Two-thirds of the undisclosed ingredients in the tested fragrances have not been safety tested, nor has a significant portion of disclosed ingredients

This issue doesn’t stop with fragrances and cosmetics, the study said. It factors into everything from aerosol sprays to nail polish to dishwashing liquids to scented air refreshers. Many chemicals we come into contact with daily remain unstudied.

What can you do to help? The study suggests:

  • Buy products with no added fragrance.
  • Use less of any of these products
  • Press for better laws to protect the public’s health
  • Demand that cosmetic companies disclose all of their ingredients.

Campaign For Safe Cosmetics, the group that co-authored the study, is a national coalition of nonprofit women’s, environmental, public health and other organizations. The Environmental Working Group also is a nonprofit that aims to use public information to protect health and the environment.

If you want more information about cosmetic products that do reveal all of their ingredients, go to the Environmental Working Group’s database of products.

Read the complete study (including the complete list of all fragrances tested) at Not So Sexy: The Health Risks of Secret Chemicals in Fragrance.

Copyright © 2010 Green Right Now | Distributed by GRN Network

Search

Advertisement

GRN on Facebook